Sunday, February 16, 2020

Hydrino experiment independently replicated

High signal to noise, independent replication of a physical chemistry experiment with radical scientific and practical impact, is now within the discretionary resources of any laboratory equipped with a DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimeter).  I hired the commercial chemistry lab ATS to do a blind replication of one of Dr. Mills' experiments.  I and the lab are both independent of Dr. Mills and Brilliant Light Power.  The original work is here, and I replicate only a small part of it (one chemical reaction). 

***UPDATE 26 Feb 20*** I misread an endothermic peak as an exothermic peak.  The observed
reaction absorbed energy instead of releasing it.  I will be repeating the experiment without the beads of FeBr2 reagent which would not mix well with the Cu(OH)2 powder, and is a possible cause of the discrepancy.***END UPDATE***

The current draft of my paper is here, along with calculations spreadsheet and the lab's report to me.  I got it done for around $1000 and the signal is huge.  (For me the breakdown was ~$500 for materials and labor, ~$600 for two gold DSC pans.  Your mileage may vary*.)  The result was 100% excess energy over the maximum theoretical from assumed conventional reactions.  Other validators, referenced in the paper, saw even more.  The paper has already been rejected by one journal (for "lack of impact," which is more humorous the more you know about Dr. Mills' theory).

I hope to inspire someone to take the next step and go looking for hydrino in the products, or just repeat what I have done and add to the accumulation of evidence (hydrino is a small hydrogen atom, with its electron below what has traditionally been called the "ground state").  How can you get below a ground state that doesn't radiate, you ask?  Like the coils in a transformer, nearby charges can affect one another through space, but without radiation.  It's called a "near field" coupling to distinguish from the "far field" which refers to radiation traveling to essentially infinite distance.

Catalysts that can accept the right amount of energy from Hydrogen can remove that energy, which upsets the force balance holding the electron in the "ground state" orbit, causing the orbit to collapse to the next stable state - a lower, "hydrino" state.  In going to the next lower stable state, the electron emits the brilliant light that Brilliant Light Power is named for.

*When asked about a follow-up, ATS indicated the cost would be more without specifying.  If you want to reproduce this experiment with them, you should probably expect to spend a few thousand dollars.  By all means, ask them for a quote. https://atslab.com/chemical-analysis/.  I got my gold pans in a set of 10 for $3000, so if you have to buy 10 to get 2, and don't have any use for the other 8, that is more cost.

7 comments:

  1. Really fantastic work, Dave. Appreciate you sharing this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your encouragement. Even if I don't get published, at least the word can spread from here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Appreciate the replication effort, Dave, for excess energy production and the associated means to produce Hydrinos.

    More can be written on the near field/far field phenom seen in physics, most notably, in RF/radio circuits including tuned/coupled circuits (radio frequency (RF) 'tank' circuits involving circulating RF currents (charges) occurring cyclically between and "L" and a "C") and antennas meant to develop a plane wave capable or radiating 'away' into 'space' (or for use near the earth's surface e.g. AM broadcast antennas. This leaves out low frequency "RFID" type exciting coils; these do not radiate as much as they simply create an intense near field owing to their very small size with respect to the operating frequency's wavelength.)

    This near-field coupling between energy 'donor' atoms/molecules (Hydrogen) and suitable energy acceptor atoms/molecules through the use of inherent resonance 'factors' (as evidenced by matching energy quanta levels?) is a most interesting phenom, one that physicists seem to have overlooked until the 'Age of Mills' (the two plus decades of Mills?).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Credit where credit is due. This is the consummation of the Age of Newton, made possible by contributions from a few obscure theorists who laid the groundwork for Mills, who then applied it to the electron, answering Einstein's quest for a unified field theory and a physical description of the electron.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The spreadsheet is a bit cryptic. Please avoid abbreviations, widen the columns and add some text like you are explaining to a high school student, because that could be your most valuable audience if the scientific establishment sticks with the 3 Monkey Philosophy.

    Does anyone know a smart high school student tester?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The spreadsheet is based on the one in Mills et al Solid Fuels that Form HOH Catalyst, with reference to Ramanujachary's replication. When I get to it I'll try to make it stand alone better.

      Delete
  6. Hi, i didnt understand the meaning of your update endo and exothermic peak. are you saying your replication was a success or a failure? did you find excess heat?

    ReplyDelete